Skip to Content
Catherine Hulshof, PhD
Home
The Lab
Our Team
Research
Resources
Publications
Course Design
Poesía
Field Notes
Get Involved
Collaborate
ALTA
ecoCode
Serpentine
Grant Guru
0
0
Catherine Hulshof, PhD
Home
The Lab
Our Team
Research
Resources
Publications
Course Design
Poesía
Field Notes
Get Involved
Collaborate
ALTA
ecoCode
Serpentine
Grant Guru
0
0
Home
Folder: The Lab
Back
Our Team
Research
Resources
Publications
Course Design
Poesía
Field Notes
Folder: Get Involved
Back
Collaborate
ALTA
ecoCode
Serpentine
Folder: Grant Guru
Back
Grant Guru Base Package
julia-joppien--3wygakaeQc-unsplash.jpg Image 1 of
julia-joppien--3wygakaeQc-unsplash.jpg
julia-joppien--3wygakaeQc-unsplash.jpg

Base Package

from $1,000.00

This is modeled after what I typically spend on a detailed NSF-style review:

  • 4–5 hours reading and annotating the full proposal (~15 pages)

  • 3–4 hours writing mock panel-style feedback (intellectual merit, broader impacts, solicitation specific criteria)

  • 1–2 hours synthesizing into a professional summary, polish, and communication with client

It’s priced at a premium rate because:

  • I’m offering deep NSF-style insights, from 10 years of direct experience serving on multiple panels annually since 2016, across multiple NSF Divisions and Programs.

  • This is high-value work that impacts the success of multi-hundred-thousand (and sometimes million)-dollar proposals

  • It includes judgment, not just proofreading — i.e., intellectual evaluation

Select your package:

  • Standard option: 7-10 biz days turnaround ($1000 total)

  • Expedited option: +$250 for 3-5 biz days turnaround ($1250 total)

  • Rush option: +$1000 for 48-hour turnaround ($2000 total)

Sold Out? Get on the Waitlist.

Package:
Quantity:
Add To Cart

This is modeled after what I typically spend on a detailed NSF-style review:

  • 4–5 hours reading and annotating the full proposal (~15 pages)

  • 3–4 hours writing mock panel-style feedback (intellectual merit, broader impacts, solicitation specific criteria)

  • 1–2 hours synthesizing into a professional summary, polish, and communication with client

It’s priced at a premium rate because:

  • I’m offering deep NSF-style insights, from 10 years of direct experience serving on multiple panels annually since 2016, across multiple NSF Divisions and Programs.

  • This is high-value work that impacts the success of multi-hundred-thousand (and sometimes million)-dollar proposals

  • It includes judgment, not just proofreading — i.e., intellectual evaluation

Select your package:

  • Standard option: 7-10 biz days turnaround ($1000 total)

  • Expedited option: +$250 for 3-5 biz days turnaround ($1250 total)

  • Rush option: +$1000 for 48-hour turnaround ($2000 total)

Sold Out? Get on the Waitlist.

This is modeled after what I typically spend on a detailed NSF-style review:

  • 4–5 hours reading and annotating the full proposal (~15 pages)

  • 3–4 hours writing mock panel-style feedback (intellectual merit, broader impacts, solicitation specific criteria)

  • 1–2 hours synthesizing into a professional summary, polish, and communication with client

It’s priced at a premium rate because:

  • I’m offering deep NSF-style insights, from 10 years of direct experience serving on multiple panels annually since 2016, across multiple NSF Divisions and Programs.

  • This is high-value work that impacts the success of multi-hundred-thousand (and sometimes million)-dollar proposals

  • It includes judgment, not just proofreading — i.e., intellectual evaluation

Select your package:

  • Standard option: 7-10 biz days turnaround ($1000 total)

  • Expedited option: +$250 for 3-5 biz days turnaround ($1250 total)

  • Rush option: +$1000 for 48-hour turnaround ($2000 total)

Sold Out? Get on the Waitlist.

Catherine Hulshof, PhD
Department of Biology
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, VA, 23284
cmhulshof@vcu.edu

Powered by One Part Creativity, One Part Grit